The door analogy
Biomolecular switches or nanomachines, typically made of proteins or nucleic acids, are the nuts and bolts of the machinery of life. They perform thousands of key functions, including chemical reactions, transporting molecules, stocking energy, and enabling movement and growth.
But how have these switches evolved to activate over different timescales? That’s a key question that has long fascinated chemists, and since the pioneering work by Monod-Wyman-Changeux and Koshland-Nemethy-Filmer in the 1960s two popular mechanisms are generally assumed to control the activation of biomolecular switches.
“The analogy of a door is convenient to illustrate these two mechanisms,” said UdeM chemistry professor Alexis Vallée-Bélisle, the principal investigator of the new study.
“The closed door represents the inactive structure of the switch or nanomachine while the open door represents its active structure. It is the interactions between the switch and its activating molecule, such as light or a molecule, that dictates the type of activation mechanism.”
“In the induced-fit mechanism, the activating molecule, or person, grabs the handle of the closed door, which provides the energy for fast opening,” Vallée-Bélisle explained. “In the conformational selection mechanism, the activating molecule needs to wait for the door to spontaneously open before it can interact and block this later in the open structure.”
While these two mechanisms were observed in many proteins, it is only recently that scientists have realized that these mechanisms could also be employed to engineer better nanosystems.