'To get to the truth'

In 5 seconds Holder of the Canada Research Chair in Precision Medicine Data Analysis, Marie-Pierre Dubé has spent 2 decades researching people's response to drug treatment and why women react differently from men.
Marie-Pierre Dubé, Université de Montréal medical professor

Marie-Pierre Dubé has award-winning expertise in genetic epidemiology, biostatistics, pharmacogenomics and cardiology – and that's not all.

In an academic career spanning two decades, the Université de Montréal medical professor has published close to 300 scientific articles, sat on 10 committees and 14 consortiums, and made over 70 presentations, including a TEDx Talk. She holds 13 patents and has received 75 research grants.

As a talented young student, she skipped doing a master's degree, and went straight from a B.Sc. (in human genetics) to a PhD (in biology), at McGill University. A stint in the pharmaceutical industry followed, then in 2005 she joined UdeM as an assistant professor.

Her CV is a brick: it's 84 pages long.

"People tell me I do too many things but I don't feel it’s ever enough," said Dubé, who also holds the Canada Research Chair in Precision Medicine Data Analysis and runs the Pharmacogenomics Centre at the UdeM-affiliated Montreal Heart Institute (MHI). Her speciality is "translating genomic discoveries into clinical research and practice" – essentially, identifying what people have in their genes that makes them respond well or poorly to prescription drug treatments.

Dubé has made this targeted "precision medicine" her life's work – with Canada's Xenon Pharmaceuticals in the early 2000s and at UdeM ever since – learning how to tailor treatments to individuals. As a health data scientist, she concentrates on cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, things such as heart attacks and diabetes. And one of her main preoccupations is to unravel the mystery of why some drugs don't work well on everyone, and that includes women.

"In drug research, if we're going to do precision medicine, with fancy genomic technology, there's an obvious low-hanging fruit to go after, and that's differences between men and women," Dubé said. “Compared to men, women are understudied, even though it would be possible to do so. It would be so easy to conduct clinical trials that are stratified and that have targeted ends for men and women and that make sure that the efficacy is the same – but it would be more costly, and they don't do that.”

That's where she and her co-researchers come in – a little late, perhaps, but better than not at all.

"We do after-the-fact analyses to ask the question: do women really benefit from a given drug? And it takes many trials and method analyses to get the answer. This is why I'm interested in studying differences between men and women in that context of precision medicine: to get to the truth."

More negative reactions

In general, woman have more negative reactions to medication than men. For instance, those who take statins to lower their cholesterol often report more severe muscle pain as a result. Similarly, women taking angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors to lower their blood pressure are more likely to end up with a persistent dry cough. And those taking sotalol to correct abnormal heart rhythms can more frequently wind up with fast, chaotic heartbeats that make them faint or worse.

In ongoing research with colleagues Marc-Olivier Pilon, Simon de Denus and Grégoire Leclair at the MHI, Dubé is looking at how one's sex affects dosing, concentrations and pharmacogenomics of 47 heart drugs – everything from blood thinners and diuretics to Beta- blockers and antidepressants. The scientists have the benefit of having not only a lot of drugs at their disposal, but also an exceptionally high number of heart patients: a cohort of just over 10,000, over one-third of whom are women.

In their analyses, the researchers employ two techniques: genotyping, using the genomics platform at UdeM's Beaulieu-Saucier Centre for Pharmacogenomics; and, to measure and quantify drugs in the patients' blood, liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry deployed by the team at the UdeM Biopharmacy Platform.

Preliminary results of this work show that for close to half of the drugs, women show much higher concentrations in their blood. 

"We'll keep studying these differences between men and women, building on this unique data resource when, hopefully, my Chair is renewed for 2017," said Dubé, "including studying environmental heat and dehydration as additional factors that may impact variability in drug response.”

Women are not Dubé's only concern.

In a more recent study, published in February in the journal Circulation, Dubé focused on a major randomised clinical trial that led to the global approval of colchicine, a drug usually prescribed for gout, for preventing cardiovascular disease. She and her team showed, for the first time in a randomised setting, that colchicine is associated with a reduction in clonal haematopoiesis, a process of acquired blood mutations recognised as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality. 

"What we've done is pave the way for using drugs to attack a biological mechanism of ageing that used to be considered unmodifiable," she said. “It helps clear things up in a situation where observational data and recent clinical trials yielded conflicting results. Clonal hematopoiesis represents a new and promising biomarker for cardiovascular disease and aging in general, and will constitute a major focus of my work in the coming years.”

Very large datasets

In her research as a chairholder, Dubé sees herself as a "data miner," deeply probing very large genomic datasets such as the U.K. Biobank, the MHI Biobank, and trials done with clinicians at the MHI and pharmaceutical giants including AstraZeneca, GSK, Sanofi, Pfizer and Servier.

One key achievement from her last five years as holder of the Chair: the development of ExPheWas, "a gene-based phenome-wide association study browser and platform that supports gene-based Mendelian randomization analyses." It includes sex-stratified and sex-combined association results from 26,616 genes across 1,746 phenotypes from over 400,000 U.K. Biobank participants, all part of Dubé's effort to investigate sex and gender differences in genetic susceptibility to disease and drug response.

"Our overarching goal is to identify subgroups of people who are most likely to benefit most from specific therapies, as well as to identify novel drug targets, and advance understanding of genetic susceptibility to disease," she explains. “We're not alone: across the globe, scientists are busy developing faster rotes to new therapies. Drug targets with genetic support are far more likely to advance successfully through all stages of development, driving major investment.”

Still, she's not naïve.

Despite, and maybe because of, her background in it, Dubé understands that if the pharmaceutical industry is interested in precision medicine, it's because there's some profit to be made from it – even from addressing differences between the sexes.

“Industry plays a crucial role in bringing new drugs to patients,” she said. “But precision medicine also forces us to think about affordability and access. The goal isn’t just better therapies - it’s making sure people can actually benefit from them.”

Share

Media requests

Université de Montréal
Phone: 514-343-6111, ext. 75930