If birds are fancy dancers, are they smarter, too?

In 5 seconds Researchers investigate the link between male birds’ elaborate displays of courtship and their cognitive abilities, physical condition and attractiveness to females.
A male zebra finch

Does a male bird with a long and complex courtship dance have superior cognitive abilities? Simply put, is a talented dancer a smarter bird?

To answer the question, researchers at Université de Montréal studied the zebra finch, a small bird known for the dramatic differences between the male and female of the species. The scientists wanted to determine whether females choose males who perform elaborate dances because those displays reflect above-average intelligence.

“Female preference for males with better cognitive skills has been observed in many species, but we still don’t know which mating signals reflect those skills,” said Frédérique Dubois, an UdeM biology professor and co-author of a recent study on the issue with Marie Barou-Dagues, a doctoral student at the time the research was carried out.

Their results suggest that while the complexity of a male zebra finch’s dance is closely linked to his attractiveness, this is because it is an indicator of the bird’s physical condition rather than his general cognitive abilities.

Asssessing preferences and abilities

To reach this conclusion, the researchers measured two things. First, they assessed the females'  preferences by observing which males they spent the most time with. This part of the study yielded a new insight: male zebra finch courtship displays are differentiated by two key traits, duration and complexity.

Next, the researchers assessed the males’ cognitive abilities using standardized tests. For example, the birds had to learn to associate a colour with a food reward, a skill that, in nature, is essential for finding food and avoiding danger. The speed with which the birds learned and their final performance on the test were used to gauge their cognitive abilities.

The researchers found that the males with more complex dances were more attractive to females, were in better physical condition—demonstrating better endurance, coordination and energy—and, to a lesser extent, exhibited stronger motor learning performance. However, there was no evidence that they were more intelligent.

“A female will choose such a partner because he is likely to pass on better genes to her offspring, feed them better and be more involved in caring for them, thus maximizing their chances of survival,” Dubois explained.

Not a conscious decision

Observations indicate that females have consistent and repeated preferences. Does it mean they are making a conscious decision? Probably not. 

“This is a somewhat anthropomorphic question,” Barou-Dagues said. “We can’t get inside an animal’s head and probe their thinking. However, we do know that preferences for specific male traits are partly innate and partly learned, largely by observing older, more experienced females.”

In all likelihood, these preferences are mainly an evolutionary legacy. “Traits linked to reproductive advantages—such as good physical condition—naturally become attractive over time,” said Barou-Dagues. “Females don’t need to ‘understand’ why; they are simply predisposed to prefer certain signals.”

However, choosing a partner is still a decision. Distinguishing between two males with similar performances may demand closer scrutiny and more finer discrimination. How the female makes these distinctions isn’t always obvious to humans. While the duration of the dance is visible, its complexity—the variety and sequence of movements—is harder to discern.

The human angle

The researchers believe the study’s findings may have implications for humans as well. They note that some human studies suggest dance can reveal information about body symmetry, which is associated with health and genetic qualities. And intelligence is also a selection criterion for human partners.

How do birds and humans assess intelligence in a partner? 

“In animals, it isn’t clear how a female determines which male is smarter,” Barou-Dagues said. “Humans can also use dance as a criterion for assessing intelligence, since symmetrical dances may indicate favourable environmental conditions for healthy development. But unlike birds, humans have other ways to evaluate a partner’s intelligence, such as humour and creativity.”

Dubois believes this study challenges the theory that intersexual selection based on dance displays influences the evolution of general cognitive abilities. It also foregrounds modular cognitive traits, such as motor learning.

“Future research should explore the relationships between multisensory mating signals—such as song, dance and plumage colouration—and cognitive abilities in order to understand how intersexual selection shapes cognitive evolution in both animals and humans,” Dubois said.

Media requests

Université de Montréal
Phone: 514-343-6111, ext. 75930